[Sydney Uni header]
School of Information Technologies

 

INFO5993 IT RESEARCH METHODS
Semester 2, 2009

Course Outline Calendar Assignments 
Timetable   Resources
News
23/10/2009
The presentation schedule for your Assignment 4 in Week13.
08/09/2009
The marks of your Assignment1&2 have been posted on your WebCT.
05/09/2009
Please complete your INFO5993 Mid-Semester Survey.
12/08/2009
Examples for Research Proposal and Literature Review
11/08/2009
If you have not done so yet, please urgently fill out the form stating your details and supervisor's name and contact.
10/08/2009
Suggestions and schedule for your Assignment 2; and short description of Assignment 3 & 4.
02/08/2009
About this week(W02)'s lecture: the first hour is as normal, and the second hour will be in the SIT Lab 117 for the librarian seminar.
27/07/2009
Welcome to INFO5993!


Outline
This unit will provide an overview of the different research methods that are used in IT. Students will learn to find and evaluate research on their topic and to present their own research plan or results for evaluation by others. The unit will develop a better understanding of what research in IT is and how it differs from other projects in IT.
This unit of study is required for students in IT who are enrolled in a research project as part of their Honours or MIT/MITM degree. It is also recomemnded for students enrolled or planning to do a research degree in IT and Engineering.

Learning outcomes
Coordinators
Peter Eades (Weeks 1-8)
peter@it.usyd.edu.au, room 3E-354, consultation time: Mondays 2-3pm
Kalina Yacef (Weeks 9-13)
kalina@it.usyd.edu.au, room 3W-317, consultation time: Mondays 2-3pm
Tom Cai
tomc@it.usyd.edu.au, room 3E-344, consultation time: Mondays 2-3pm

Our offices are in the School of Information Technologies Building, J12, directions

Timetable
Monday, 3-5pm, School of IT Lecture Theatre - lectures and workshops

Assessment overview
Task
Due Submission mode Marked by Late submission policy
Assignment 1:
Database search (5%)
w3, Monday 3pm
e-mail submission to your supervisor, cc to Peter research project supervisor and Peter No late submissions are allowed
Assignment 2:
part1: Review lecture (10%)
part2: Feedback on other presentations (5%)
w4-w5, Monday 3pm, in class present in the class
course coordinators
No late submissions are allowed
Assignment 3:
Research proposal (45%)
w10, Tuesday 3pm e-mail submission to your supervisor, cc to Kalina research project supervisor and Kalina
- A penalty applies: minus 1 mark per each day after the deadline;
- Assignments will not be accepted after more than 7 days after the deadline.
Assignment 4:
part 1: Presentation (25%)
part 2: Feedback on other presentations (10%)
w12, in class
part 1:  printout of your slides (preferably 6 slides/page) due at the beginning of scheduled class when your presentation is due
part 2: due 5:00pm on the day following the presentation; email submission to Kalina
course coordinators No late presentations/ submissions are allowed

Important note: You are required to attend research seminars (Basser seminar series, your research group seminars, outside seminars, ..). Your supervisor will confirm your regular attendance (>= ~ one a week). A
penalty for non-attendance will be applied (-5% maximum).

-The submissions of Assignments 1 and 3 should include the title of your research topic, your name, the name of your supervisor, the unit of study and the date.
-To maintain and cite references use proper software (e.g. Endnote); chose a style, e.g. IEEE or ACM and be consistent. You can download Endnote from the Library's web page; there is an on-line tutorial and also face-to-face classes.
-Please also read the University Policy on Academic Honesty and submit the appropriate cover sheet with your signature with each hardcopy submission. The cover sheets are available from the link above.

Short description of the assessment tasks


Assignment 1: Database Search (5%)

Submit a report that includes:
1) a list of 10 articles or books which seem very relevant to your research topic
2) a review of 1 paper from this list that you and your supervisor consider particularly important  for your research topic. This should be no more than half a page long and include:
-the paper details
-summary of the paper - what is this paper about and what is its main contribution
-1- 2 main strengths and weaknesses of the paper
- how does the paper relate to your research topic, e.g. why is it relevant
- questions that you want to ask the authors
- directions for future research that you think are worthwhile to consider - identified by you or the authors
3) a list of the top conference and journals in your research area (up to 6)
4) a list of the main research groups working in your area (up to 6).

Assignment 2: Review Lecture (15%)

You should choose a research paper and review it in a 9 minute talk.
Here are suggestions for how to structure your talk.
Your talk will be marked and count 10% toward your final grade.
You should also ask questions of at least two other students.
You have been assigned to be a questioner in two talks.
Your questioning will be marked and count 5% toward your final grade.
Here is the schedule of talks and questions.

Assignment 3: Research Proposal (45%)

-Literature Review (30%): Submit a report that is a critical review of the literature you have found that is related to your research topic. The report should be about 5-10 pages. Include at least 20 properly referenced articles or books. Organise the review around the questions or claims relevant to your research rather than just listing the papers you have read.
Assessment criteria: covers the most important relevant work, clearly identifies the contributions of the literature reviewed, identifies the research methods used in this collection of literature, connects the literature to the research topic by identifying its relevance, clarity of presentation and english.
-Outline of research approach (15%): Submit a page or two which identifies the research contribution you intend to make, and outlines how you will gather evidence to back this up. You should provide enough detail to show that you have thought about how to convince readers. For example, if you intend to measure performance, you should describe what aspects will be measured, and what you will compare the measurements to; but you don't need to describe exactly the hardware platform, or details of the harnass that will run the tests etc.
Assessment criteria: clearly states the intended contribution, offers an approach to evidence gathering that is appropriate to the claim, clarity of presentation and English.

Assignment 4: Research Presentation and Feedback (35%)
Part 1: Presentation  (25%): **
10 mins talk (slides)  + 2 mins questions/change over **
For students completing their research project the following semester, this is a presentation of research proposal and should include: motivation and context, objectives (research questions), critical literature review, research method, plan (with tasks and timetable).
For students completing their research project this semester, this is a presentation of research results and should include: motivation and context, objectives (research questions), critical literature review, research method, results, discussion of the results, conclusions and future work.
Assessment criteria: quality of slides, organisation, presentation style; marking scheme.
Part 2: Feedback on other presentations (10%)
Each student will review 2 other presentations and write 1/2 -1 page feedback comments. There are 3 blocks (A, B and C) each student needs to review the presentations of  2 other students presenting in each other block, with the same number as described in the presentation timetable (schedule). You need to complete the following feedback form.


Calendar
Week Date Topic Lecturer(s)
Slides
1 27 JUL
Introduction to Research Methods

Peter Eades

rm01.pdf  

2 3 AUG
Bibliographic Search; Bibliometrics and Publication


Kalina Yacef

Caroline Regan, SciTech Libraries

rm02.pdf 

library contacts
web of science

3 10 AUG
Reviews

Peter and Kalina

rm03.pdf 


4 17 AUG
Assignment 2: Student Review Lectures (I)

Peter and Kalina



5 24 AUG
Assignment 2: Student Review Lectures (II)

Peter and Tom



6 31 AUG

Research Evaluation Styles (I):
Performance Evaluation
HCI Evaluation



Michael Cahill
Tony Huang


rm06a.pdf
rm06b.pdf

7 7 SEP

Research Evaluation Styles (II)
Qualitative Research Methods in IS
Empirical Evaluation
Research Ethics



Joseph Davis
Yong Xia (RPAH)
Peter Eades


rm07a.pdf
rm07b.pdf
rm07c.pdf

8 14 SEP

Research in Industry and Commercialisation


Phil Robertson (NICTA)
rm08.pdf
9 21 SEP
IP Law


How To Write A Literature Review

Greg Gering (Sydnovate)

George Ridgway (Learning Centre)






Mid-semester-break Week




10
5 OCT

Labour Day Holiday

Assignment 3 deadline: 3PM, 6 OCT (Tuesday)





11
12 OCT
How To Write A Research Proposal
How To Give Peer Feedback

George Ridgway (Learning Centre)


 
12
19 OCT

Catch up


13
26 OCT
1-5pm

Assignment 4: Student presentations of research proposal and feedback on other presentations

** please note change of time ** (same location)


Kalina and Tom


Resources

Research and postgraduate studies in IT
How to do Research in the MIT AI Lab by David Chapman (ed.)
How to do Research in Computer Science by Michael Schillo
A Letter to Research Students by Duane A. Bailey
The PhD Process by Dale Callahan, IEEE Potentials - includes hints on how to select a research topic
How to Have a Bad Career in Research/Academia by David Patterson
How to be Terrible Graduate Student by Graeme Hirst
How to Succeed in Graduate School - A Guide for Students and Advisors by Marie desJardins
Graduate Study in the Computer and Mathematical Sciences: A Survival Manual by Dianne O'Leary
-"It's a PhD, not a Nobel Prize: how experienced examiners assess research theses" by G. Mullins and M. Kiley, Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 2002, pp. 369-386 (available from the library's home page and also here)
-"Early warning signes in postgraduate research education: a different approach to ensuring timely completions" by C. Manathunga, Teaching in Higher Education, 10(2), 2005, pp.219-233 (available from the library's home page)
-Writing for Computer Science, Second Edition, by Justin Zobel, Springer 2004

Presentations
Presenting Your Research: Papers, Presentations, and People by Marie desJardins (talk at the AAAI/SIGART Doctoral Consortium 2003)
Speaker's Guide by Ian Parberry
The Short Talks by Charles Van Loan
Oral Presentation Advice by Mark Hill
Some Lecturing Heuristics by Patrick H. Winston

Ranking and citations
Publish or Perish - software for retrieving citations and calculating metrics such as h-index, g-index, etc.
The Rise and Rise of Citation Analysis by L. Meho
h-index
g-index
Computing Research and Education Association of Australia and New Zealand (CORE) - ranking of IT conferences and journals; code of conduct

Women in Computer Science
CRA-W - useful links and resources
Do Women Hate IT? - interesting discussion

More useful links
An automatic CS research topic generator
An automatic CS research paper generaror

6.xxx at MIT by Patrick H. Winston
A Dictionary of Useful Research Phrases

University policies
Human Ethics
Intellectual Property
University Postgraduate Research Studies Handbook
Code of Conduct for responsible Research Practice and Guidelines for Dealing with Allegations of Research Misconduct
Code of Practice for the Supervision of Research Students


Honours and postgraduate at the School of Information Technology (with useful links to the Faculty of Engineering and the University)
Honours
Postgraduare studies (research)
Postgraduare studies (coursework)


Last modified: 21 September 2009